Post by account_disabled on Dec 28, 2023 3:57:38 GMT
Adifferential treatment based directly on religious affiliation or belief within the meaning of Article a of Directive . However the Court does not rule out the possibility that the referring court may conclude that the domestic rule at issue in the main dispute establishes differential treatment based indirectly on religious affiliation or belief within the meaning of Article b of Directive if it is proven the verification of which is up to him that the seemingly neutral obligation it contains actually leads to a special disadvantage for people who adhere to a religion or certain beliefs. The adoption of such a general and undifferentiated policy must also be objectively justified by a legitimate aim.
Otherwise this would constitute indirect discrimination in the sense Country Email List of art. para. b of Directive EC according to which indirect discrimination occurs when an apparently neutral provision criterion or practice may result in a particular disadvantage for persons of a certain religion or of certain beliefs... compared to other people . As for the legitimate purpose Court specified that the will to display in relations with both public and private customers a policy of political philosophical or religious neutrality must be considered legitimate . In fact the employers desire to project an image of neutrality towards customers relates to the freedom to.
Conduct a business as recognized by Article of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. To be legal however such a policy should only apply to workers who will come into contact with the employers customers . Regarding the appropriateness of an internal rule such as the one at issue in the main dispute it is necessary to state that the fact of prohibiting workers from visibly wearing signs expressing political philosophical or religious beliefs is able to ensure the proper application of a policy of neutrality provided that.
Otherwise this would constitute indirect discrimination in the sense Country Email List of art. para. b of Directive EC according to which indirect discrimination occurs when an apparently neutral provision criterion or practice may result in a particular disadvantage for persons of a certain religion or of certain beliefs... compared to other people . As for the legitimate purpose Court specified that the will to display in relations with both public and private customers a policy of political philosophical or religious neutrality must be considered legitimate . In fact the employers desire to project an image of neutrality towards customers relates to the freedom to.
Conduct a business as recognized by Article of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. To be legal however such a policy should only apply to workers who will come into contact with the employers customers . Regarding the appropriateness of an internal rule such as the one at issue in the main dispute it is necessary to state that the fact of prohibiting workers from visibly wearing signs expressing political philosophical or religious beliefs is able to ensure the proper application of a policy of neutrality provided that.